There
must be more than one reason behind that. One could be employers now
require existing employees to take over some of the responsibilities for
the vacant positions until they are filled. When employers are not
filling the vacant positions, the increased number of payroll positions
does not help lower the unemployment rate.
Another
possible reason is that fewer employers are willing to invest in
candidates with less experience but great potential. Companies prefer to
hire candidates who are ready to plug in and perform the job
immediately --- usually those holding a similar position in a
competitive firm. By doing so, companies can save a good amount of
training and development cost. Therefore, it may seem everyone is
“hiring,” but the truth is everyone is fighting for the same candidates
who have already had a job. When no one is hiring the unemployed, the
increased number of empty positions has little effect on the
unemployment rate.
I
consider what I mentioned above the “malpractices” in HR operations
because these companies are doing nothing but “digging the grave” for
themselves. Today, almost every professional is on LinkedIn. Many are
also active on other social media platforms. As compared to regular
staff, valuable employees are more vulnerable to be seen on the internet
and be approached by a competitor. As a result, when the economy is
turning around, the companies that require employees to do more for less
or do not want to invest in their human capital will end up losing the
top talent for the competitors.
Considering
retention management is a system-wise approach to encourage valuable
employees to stay with the employer, I would like to ask you the
following questions: What considerations a company must take in managing
employee retention? Based on what you experienced in the workplace or
what you have read in literature, what tactics can employers use to
manage employee retention? Which tactics work well? Which do not? For
what reasons?
Relevant discussion:
References:
Rampell, Catherine. (2013, February 2). Job growth steady, but unemployment rises to 7.9%. The New York Times, pp. B1. Also available online via http://nyti.ms/XxVsxP
The picture was downloaded from FrankCrum
I think retention can be specific to the industry. For example, the hospitality field has a great deal of turnover in comparison to the teaching field. So, often the benefits or incentives in one industry can be specific to the individuals working in that field.
ReplyDeleteSome people in the hospitality field may want more traveling opportunities. But, teachers almost expect summers off whereas that would be unheard of if you worked a city hotel.
Doctors, researchers, social media experts, professors and politicians may all want different benefits in the workplace.
The section about hiring those who already have the potential an experience is very true. I am about to graduate and I feel like management positions are filled up with those who already have the experience or have been in the companies for a while. No one wants to take someone new and train them from the beginning. (I kind of hope they would)
DeleteGetting an internship is very important. I also feel it is a good start if a student can get into a management training programs. Many hotels and restaurants have management training programs available. We can have a private conversation about career planning. I will be very happy to help if there is anything I can.
Delete